Browse SDS Blog posts by category
about us
(9)
addiction
(11)
adolescents
(11)
aggression
(3)
alcohol
(2)
anger
(3)
anger management
(8)
anxiety
(7)
attention
(1)
brain exercise
(5)
Brief Solution
(9)
BSFT
(11)
call for help
(1)
CBT
(17)
CCBT
(1)
conduct disorder
(1)
crime
(1)
current affairs
(3)
delegate debate
(27)
dementia
(2)
depression
(17)
development
(3)
diabetes
(2)
difficult people
(2)
discounts
(1)
drugs
(2)
DSM-IV
(1)
DSM-V
(1)
eating disorders
(2)
education
(1)
elderly care
(4)
emotion
(6)
ethical issues
(4)
evolution
(3)
exercise
(1)
extroverted
(1)
facebook
(4)
food
(14)
food abuse
(9)
general
(4)
genetics
(2)
groupwork
(3)
habits
(5)
happiness
(5)
health
(8)
IAPT
(3)
internet
(2)
Interpersonal psychotherapy
(3)
language
(2)
maintenace motivational interviewing
(2)
medication
(3)
memory
(1)
mental health
(17)
Migraines
(1)
mindfulness
(2)
miracle question
(2)
motivation
(10)
Motivation.
(4)
motivational interviewing
(8)
new ideas
(3)
NICE
(1)
Obesity
(6)
online
(3)
outgoing
(1)
pain management
(1)
panic attacks
(3)
personal confidence
(1)
phobia
(2)
poll
(4)
positive psychology
(13)
positive therapy
(10)
post-stroke
(2)
prejudice
(2)
psycho-oncology
(1)
psychotherapy DVDs
(10)
PTSD
(2)
quotes
(1)
research
(5)
resource based therapies
(9)
SDS News
(24)
self assessment
(3)
self control
(1)
self esteem
(4)
self harm
(1)
self regulation
(1)
sex differences
(1)
smoking
(5)
social connections
(7)
social environment
(14)
spending cuts
(2)
stages of change
(2)
Stress
(7)
stroke
(4)
substance misuse
(8)
suicide
(1)
supervision
(3)
support
(1)
taste
(1)
therapy
(3)
training
(25)
training dvds
(17)
tribute
(1)
weight loss
(1)
youtube
(8)
Monday, 7 February 2011
No Health Without Mental Health
Greetings all!
The Coalition Government has just published its initial plans on mental health - "No Health Without Mental Health": "No Health Without Mental Health"
I don't want to go into the content of the document at present or even raise the question of how mental health can be improved within a context of service cuts.
Instead, I want to draw your attention to and seek your thoughts on a key expressed assumption within the document highlighted by NHS Networks, namely that " THE GOVERNMENT [HAS THE] AIM OF ACHIEVING PARITY OF ESTEEM BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH". I’ve never come across such a strongly expressed statement of parity between physical and mental health in ANY government policy document before.
Now, of course, this may all be talk and that the reality may be quite different. However, my cynicism isn't quite so marked - not because of my belief in the intrinsic altruism of governments - but rather because of the financial issues currently being grappled with.
Firstly, there is the issue of the welfare budget. Forgive me if I'm teaching you to suck eggs here but for those unaware of the history of incapacity benefits let me give some brief background. Twenty years ago, Invalidity and Sickness Benefit (as it was then called) along with associated housing benefit was significantly short term in nature (six months or less) and primarily claimed by those with industrial injuries and pain problems. By 2010 this situation had radically changed whereby an increasing number of claimants were claiming for more than six months and over 50% of these were claiming for mental health problems. At estimated costs of £16 billion a year all political parties began to look seriously at the question of addressing this cost. IAPT (Increasing Access To Psychological Therapies), introduced by the last government and extended by this government by hundreds of millions of pounds, is the most visible example of how seriously central government now takes mental health. (CBT Training); (Managing Depression)
Secondly, the parity between mental health and physical health has also become apparent as a result of their interconnectedness - again from the perspective of the costs, this time associated with health costs associated with "long term conditions". The latter includes such illnesses as diabetes, cardiovascular problems, respiratory diseases and stroke. They are conditions that are often associated with repeated hospital admissions (which are costly) usually prompted by failure to maintain changes in health behaviour or because of the de-motivating effects of mental health problems such as depression. The thinking is that IF services can address depression or poor motivation in such groups, hospital re-admission rates will fall and costs reduced. (Motivational Interviewing Training); (Psychological Coping Post-Stroke)
Now this is all very understandable and laudable stuff - all industrialised countries at present are trying to contain healthcare costs, but a recognition that mental and physical health are intrinsically interconnected strikes me as a radical new framework in which to start debating this. However, it also raises difficult questions about the priorities that we we establish within this however.
• With limited money, do you agree that Depression and Degenerative Arthritis are of "parity of esteem".
• What about Panic Attacks and Palliative Care or Gall Bladder problems and Generalised Anxiety Disorder? Or do you think that we should recognise that such "parity of esteem" varies according to the type of problem.
• Should Botox continue to be funded on the NHS in certain circumstances when those with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder still have problems finding ANY service wanting to work with them?
• Should Pancreatitis be seen as having a "parity of esteem" with PTSD or should the latter be seen as a more pressing issue.
These are difficult questions with no easy answers. However the government's express acceptance of "parity of esteem" between physical and mental health opens up this debate.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? ALL VIEWS AND IDEAS ARE GREATLY WELCOMED.
The Coalition Government has just published its initial plans on mental health - "No Health Without Mental Health": "No Health Without Mental Health"
I don't want to go into the content of the document at present or even raise the question of how mental health can be improved within a context of service cuts.
Instead, I want to draw your attention to and seek your thoughts on a key expressed assumption within the document highlighted by NHS Networks, namely that " THE GOVERNMENT [HAS THE] AIM OF ACHIEVING PARITY OF ESTEEM BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH". I’ve never come across such a strongly expressed statement of parity between physical and mental health in ANY government policy document before.
Now, of course, this may all be talk and that the reality may be quite different. However, my cynicism isn't quite so marked - not because of my belief in the intrinsic altruism of governments - but rather because of the financial issues currently being grappled with.
Firstly, there is the issue of the welfare budget. Forgive me if I'm teaching you to suck eggs here but for those unaware of the history of incapacity benefits let me give some brief background. Twenty years ago, Invalidity and Sickness Benefit (as it was then called) along with associated housing benefit was significantly short term in nature (six months or less) and primarily claimed by those with industrial injuries and pain problems. By 2010 this situation had radically changed whereby an increasing number of claimants were claiming for more than six months and over 50% of these were claiming for mental health problems. At estimated costs of £16 billion a year all political parties began to look seriously at the question of addressing this cost. IAPT (Increasing Access To Psychological Therapies), introduced by the last government and extended by this government by hundreds of millions of pounds, is the most visible example of how seriously central government now takes mental health. (CBT Training); (Managing Depression)
Secondly, the parity between mental health and physical health has also become apparent as a result of their interconnectedness - again from the perspective of the costs, this time associated with health costs associated with "long term conditions". The latter includes such illnesses as diabetes, cardiovascular problems, respiratory diseases and stroke. They are conditions that are often associated with repeated hospital admissions (which are costly) usually prompted by failure to maintain changes in health behaviour or because of the de-motivating effects of mental health problems such as depression. The thinking is that IF services can address depression or poor motivation in such groups, hospital re-admission rates will fall and costs reduced. (Motivational Interviewing Training); (Psychological Coping Post-Stroke)
Now this is all very understandable and laudable stuff - all industrialised countries at present are trying to contain healthcare costs, but a recognition that mental and physical health are intrinsically interconnected strikes me as a radical new framework in which to start debating this. However, it also raises difficult questions about the priorities that we we establish within this however.
• With limited money, do you agree that Depression and Degenerative Arthritis are of "parity of esteem".
• What about Panic Attacks and Palliative Care or Gall Bladder problems and Generalised Anxiety Disorder? Or do you think that we should recognise that such "parity of esteem" varies according to the type of problem.
• Should Botox continue to be funded on the NHS in certain circumstances when those with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder still have problems finding ANY service wanting to work with them?
• Should Pancreatitis be seen as having a "parity of esteem" with PTSD or should the latter be seen as a more pressing issue.
These are difficult questions with no easy answers. However the government's express acceptance of "parity of esteem" between physical and mental health opens up this debate.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? ALL VIEWS AND IDEAS ARE GREATLY WELCOMED.
| Your reaction: |
Thursday, 3 February 2011
Early Bird Reminder!
This is just a quick reminder that the Early Bird Discount (EBD) of £26 for the “How to Be More Effective: Therapy Applications of Translational Research” course will be expiring during February. (With EBD you pay £99.00 (£118.80 inc VAT) instead of the regular price of £125.00 (£150.00 inc VAT))
The Early Bird Discount is only applicable to the places booked a month or more prior to the chosen date of course.
Please check the dates and venues and book quickly to make sure that you take an advantage of this discounted rate: http://www.skillsdevelopment.co.uk/seminars.php?courseid=78
Read more about the course: http://www.skillsdevelopment.co.uk/files/Eff_Therapy_Interview_Nov2010.pdf
The Early Bird Discount is only applicable to the places booked a month or more prior to the chosen date of course.
Please check the dates and venues and book quickly to make sure that you take an advantage of this discounted rate: http://www.skillsdevelopment.co.uk/seminars.php?courseid=78
Read more about the course: http://www.skillsdevelopment.co.uk/files/Eff_Therapy_Interview_Nov2010.pdf
DVD Offer
We are excited to let you know about a very special double DVD training pack in our online store:
Resolving Trauma in Psychotherapy: A Somatic Approach with Dr Peter Levine http://www.psychotherapydvds.com/epages/colt5155.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=/Shops/colt5155/Products/2124/SubProducts/2124-0001
Watch a true master, Dr. Peter A. Levine, demonstrate a course of body-oriented trauma therapy in this extremely compelling and in-depth video with an Iraq Veteran diagnosed with severe PTSD.
You can watch a short video extract from the set right here on our front page: http://www.psychotherapydvds.com
Peter A. Levine, PhD, is the developer of Somatic Experiencing® and founder of the Foundation for Human Enrichment. He teaches in this work throughout the world and in various indigenous cultures. Levine is the author of the best-selling book, 'Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma: The Innate Capacity to Transform Overwhelming Experiences' and he has recently co-published a comprehensive book on childhood trauma, 'Trauma Through a Child's Eyes: Awakening the Ordinary Miracle of Healing,' as well as a guide for parents, 'Trauma-Proofing Your Kids: A Parents' Guide for Instilling Confidence, Joy and Resilience.'
By watching this DVD training set, you will:
• Learn the nine building blocks of the Somatic Experiencing® approach
• Understand the physiological orientation that underpins this method of trauma resolution
• Have the tools to integrate basic somatic methods into your clinical work with trauma clients
YOU CAN CURRENTLY SAVE £10 ON THIS NEW RELEASE. THIS OFFER IS VALID ONLY FOR THE NEXT 10 DAYS.
Resolving Trauma in Psychotherapy: A Somatic Approach with Dr Peter Levine http://www.psychotherapydvds.com/epages/colt5155.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=/Shops/colt5155/Products/2124/SubProducts/2124-0001
Watch a true master, Dr. Peter A. Levine, demonstrate a course of body-oriented trauma therapy in this extremely compelling and in-depth video with an Iraq Veteran diagnosed with severe PTSD.
You can watch a short video extract from the set right here on our front page: http://www.psychotherapydvds.com
Peter A. Levine, PhD, is the developer of Somatic Experiencing® and founder of the Foundation for Human Enrichment. He teaches in this work throughout the world and in various indigenous cultures. Levine is the author of the best-selling book, 'Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma: The Innate Capacity to Transform Overwhelming Experiences' and he has recently co-published a comprehensive book on childhood trauma, 'Trauma Through a Child's Eyes: Awakening the Ordinary Miracle of Healing,' as well as a guide for parents, 'Trauma-Proofing Your Kids: A Parents' Guide for Instilling Confidence, Joy and Resilience.'
By watching this DVD training set, you will:
• Learn the nine building blocks of the Somatic Experiencing® approach
• Understand the physiological orientation that underpins this method of trauma resolution
• Have the tools to integrate basic somatic methods into your clinical work with trauma clients
YOU CAN CURRENTLY SAVE £10 ON THIS NEW RELEASE. THIS OFFER IS VALID ONLY FOR THE NEXT 10 DAYS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About this Blog
This is our first attempt to join the exciting world of blogging and bring to you all the fresh and hot news about the world of psychology and, of course, about your favourite training company. This is our new enterprise and we are finding our way in this mysterious world of blogging cautiously (but surely...) :-)
We are hoping to move our popular SDS Delegate Debate into this blogging format in the future and looking forward to lively discussions here with you. We are planning to start with publishing already existing SDS Delegate Debates — with comments received from you. Then we'll move to the current news as well as will run new delegate debates there.
Feel free to leave comments to any of the posts — whether they are old debates, the news or new debates. As you can guess — every blogger loves his readers and LIVES for the comments. :-) We are just the same. You don’t need to register in order to be able to comment. You can leave your feedback as “Anonymous”, however, may we ask you to sign you name (or nick) at the end of your comment (even if you are commenting without logging in) so that we know how to address you.
Another useful tool that SDS Blog provides us with is availability of Polls that enable us to find out your views about various subjects. Polls are located on the left panel of the page and updated regularly. Please feel free to vote. You can see the results of each poll by clicking the button "Results".
If you wish to register — nothing can be easier — you just open a Google account — most of you, surely, already use one.
Your comments are read by SDS Consultants regularly and — in many cases — replied to.
The blog is moderated — mainly to protect you and other readers from spam and irrelevant comments.
All posts are tagged — hopefully it'll help you to find your way around there.
Wish us luck and please join the list of our followers.
We are hoping to move our popular SDS Delegate Debate into this blogging format in the future and looking forward to lively discussions here with you. We are planning to start with publishing already existing SDS Delegate Debates — with comments received from you. Then we'll move to the current news as well as will run new delegate debates there.
Feel free to leave comments to any of the posts — whether they are old debates, the news or new debates. As you can guess — every blogger loves his readers and LIVES for the comments. :-) We are just the same. You don’t need to register in order to be able to comment. You can leave your feedback as “Anonymous”, however, may we ask you to sign you name (or nick) at the end of your comment (even if you are commenting without logging in) so that we know how to address you.
Another useful tool that SDS Blog provides us with is availability of Polls that enable us to find out your views about various subjects. Polls are located on the left panel of the page and updated regularly. Please feel free to vote. You can see the results of each poll by clicking the button "Results".
If you wish to register — nothing can be easier — you just open a Google account — most of you, surely, already use one.
Your comments are read by SDS Consultants regularly and — in many cases — replied to.
The blog is moderated — mainly to protect you and other readers from spam and irrelevant comments.
All posts are tagged — hopefully it'll help you to find your way around there.
Wish us luck and please join the list of our followers.
